![]() ![]() It’s a horror comedy, and it’s a blast.”ĭespite its emphasis on scares, Nilsen believes the original “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” is an art film. Nilsen says those efforts haven’t matched the original, though he said Hooper’s sequel is “a howl. “When we do look outside Austin – a lot of these sort of surrounding communities around the Chisholm Trail, let’s say – these are cattle communities,” Nilsen said.įilmmakers have remade “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre,” and its original director, Tobe Hooper, made a sequel. Venturing outside Austin, the people in the movie encounter something very different than the cosmopolitan environment they’re used to. But the movie connects it to cattle-raising and butchery – quintessential occupations in rural Texas. Then, even moreso than today, the capital city was an island of liberal politics in a conservative state. ![]() “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” is closely connected with the time and place where it was made – Austin in the 1970s. Though the story is fictional, it’s “based on true events” tagline probably made it seem even scarier than it otherwise would have. “Maybe the blood that people most remember is one guy cutting his own hand – cutting his own finger,” Nilsen said. Lars Nilsen of the Austin Film Society told Texas Standard that “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” isn’t actually as bloody as people imagine, but it is a frightening film. Forty-six years ago this month “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” unleashed seismic reactions in moviegoers that still resonate today, as do its connections to Texas. ![]() Others point to its influence in the slasher genre of films. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |